Families' Heartache Regarding Shoreline Erosion Endangering Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.
An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards
Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Past
A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy
Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.
“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”
Seeking Solutions and Certainty
An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.
Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.
“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”
He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”
The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.