🔗 Share this article

For months, threatening messages persisted. Initially, reportedly from an ex-law enforcement official and an ex-military commander, subsequently from law enforcement directly. Finally, one resident asserts he was summoned to the local precinct and warned explicitly: remain silent or experience severe repercussions.

This third-generation resident is one of many fighting a high-value project where this historic settlement – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – is scheduled to be demolished and modernized by a large business group.

"The unique ecosystem of Dharavi is like nowhere else in the planet," says the protester. "Yet the plan aims to dismantle our way of life and prevent our protests."

Contrasting Realities

The narrow alleys of this community present a dramatic difference to the towering buildings and Bollywood penthouses that loom over the area. Homes are built haphazardly and frequently lacking adequate facilities, small-scale operations produce dangerous fumes and the environment is saturated with the overpowering odor of uncovered waste channels.

To some, the vision of the slum's redevelopment into a glistening neighborhood of high-end towers, neat parks, modern retail complexes and apartments with proper sanitation is an optimistic future come true.

"We lack sufficient health services, roads or drainage and there's nowhere for children to play," states A Selvin Nadar, in his fifties, who moved from his home state in the early eighties. "The only way is to clear the area and provide modern residences."

Resident Opposition

However, some, such as Shaikh, are opposing the plan.

All recognize that this community, historically ignored as an illegal encroachment, is urgently needing investment and development. Yet they fear that this plan – absent of community input – could potentially convert valuable urban land into an elite enclave, displacing the lower-caste, working-class residents who have been there since generations ago.

It was these marginalized, displaced people who built up the empty marshland into a frequently examined example of community resilience and economic productivity, whose output is valued at between $1m and $2m per year, making it a major unofficial markets.

Relocation Worries

Among approximately 1 million inhabitants living in the packed sprawling zone, fewer than half will be able for alternative accommodation in the project, which is estimated to take seven years to finish. The remainder will be moved to wastelands and coastal regions on the distant periphery of the metropolis, threatening to divide a long-established social network. Certain individuals will be denied residences at all.

People eligible to continue living in the area will be allocated units in multi-story structures, a substantial change from the evolved, shared lifestyle of living and working that has sustained Dharavi for generations.

Commercial activities from garment work to clay work and recycling are likely to decrease in quantity and be moved to a specific "business area" far from residential areas.

Survival Challenge

In the case of Shaikh, a craftsman and multi-generational inhabitant to call home the slum, the project presents a survival challenge. His rickety, three-storey facility produces apparel – tailored coats, luxury coats, studded bomber jackets – marketed in premium stores in south Mumbai and abroad.

His family resides in the accommodations underneath and employees and tailors – workers from other states – live there, allowing him to sustain operations. Away from the slum, accommodation prices are often tenfold more expensive for minimal space.

Harassment and Intimidation

In the official facilities nearby, an illustrated mock-up of the Dharavi project illustrates an alternative outlook. Slickly dressed inhabitants move around on bicycles and eco-friendly transport, purchasing international baked goods and breakfast items and having coffee on a terrace near a restaurant and treat station. It is a stark contrast from the affordable idli sambar morning meal and budget beverage that maintains the neighborhood.

"This represents no progress for residents," states the artisan. "It represents a massive real estate deal that will make it unaffordable for our community to continue."

Additionally, there exists distrust of the business conglomerate. Headed by a powerful tycoon – among the country's wealthiest and a supporter of the national leader – the business group has encountered allegations of preferential treatment and ethical concerns, which it disputes.

While local authorities describes it as a joint project, the business group invested a significant amount for its 80% stake. A case stating that the initiative was unfairly awarded to the developer is being considered in the nation's highest judicial body.

Continued Intimidation

From when they initiated to actively protest the project, protesters and community members assert they have been subjected to an extended period of coercion and warning – comprising messages, clear intimidation and insinuations that speaking against the project was comparable with speaking against the country – by figures they assert work for the business conglomerate.

Included in these suspected of making intimidations is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c